Quick picks
The field splits cleanly by platform and by who operates the DR. Use these picks as a starting point, then match against your own hypervisor, cloud and management-model requirements.
Best overall
Zerto (HPE)
The strongest all-round DR platform: continuous data protection with near-zero RPO across VMware, Hyper-V and public cloud, plus mature ransomware recovery.
View pickBest for MSPs
Veeam
The most flexible route to DRaaS for many teams: replicate to a service provider of your choice via Cloud Connect, and orchestrate recovery with Veeam Recovery Orchestrator.
View pickBest value
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
The best-value cloud-native DR option: continuous block-level replication with simple per-server-hour pricing and no idle recovery site until you need it.
View pickBest for small business
Datto SIRIS
The go-to all-in-one BCDR for SMBs delivered through MSPs: hardware, software and cloud in one flat-fee package with instant virtualization and cloud failover.
View pickDisaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) has become the default way organizations of every size protect themselves against outages, ransomware and hardware failure, because it replaces an expensive idle secondary data center with cloud-based replication and on-demand failover. But "DRaaS" spans very different things: self-managed replication platforms you run yourself, hyperscaler DR services billed by usage, and fully managed continuity services delivered by MSPs. This guide compares eight of the most widely deployed options, explains which buyer each one suits, and is explicit about what we could and couldn't verify from vendor documentation. Zerto (HPE) is our overall pick for its continuous data protection across VMware, Hyper-V and public cloud, but the right choice depends heavily on your existing stack and whether you want to run DR yourself or hand it to a provider.
Key takeaways
- "DRaaS" is not one product category - it ranges from self-managed replication software (Zerto, ASR, AWS DRS) to fully managed services delivered by MSPs (Datto, Acronis, Veeam-powered providers).
- Only Azure Site Recovery and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery publish transparent per-unit pricing; every other option here is quote-based through the vendor or a partner.
- Continuous data protection with near-zero RPO is a genuine differentiator - Zerto, AWS DRS and Commvault stand out here, while image-snapshot tools like Datto trade some RPO for simplicity.
- None of these solutions is open source or has a genuinely free production tier, and none currently supports Proxmox or XCP-ng natively - verify hypervisor coverage against your own environment.
- Cyber/ransomware recovery - immutable copies, clean-room validation and malware-free failover points - is now a standard expectation, and most of these tools address it, though implementations differ.
How we picked
This is an editorial, source-based roundup, not a hands-on lab test. We evaluated each solution against the vendor's own product pages, documentation and (where published) pricing pages, plus corroborating technical write-ups. Scores are editorial judgements meant to help readers weigh trade-offs, not benchmark measurements. Where a capability, price, platform or deployment option could not be verified from a reliable source, we marked it unknown or partial rather than guessing.
| Criterion | Weight | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Replication model and RPO/RTO | high | RPO and RTO define how much data you can lose and how long you can be down - the core promise of any DR solution. |
| Cyber and ransomware recovery | high | Modern outages are increasingly ransomware-driven, and recovering into a reinfected environment defeats the purpose of DR. |
| Platform and hypervisor coverage | high | A DR tool that doesn't cover your production platform is a non-starter, and coverage gaps (e.g. Proxmox) are common. |
| Public cloud recovery target | medium | Cloud targets remove the capital cost of an idle DR data center, the main economic driver behind DRaaS. |
| Orchestration and testing | high | An untested DR plan usually fails when it matters; orchestration and easy testing are what make recovery reliable. |
| Management model | medium | Team capacity determines whether self-managed DR is realistic or whether a managed service is the safer choice. |
| Pricing transparency | medium | Predictable, transparent pricing simplifies budgeting and comparison; quote-only pricing adds procurement friction. |
The tools, ranked
8 toolsZerto (HPE) · Hewlett Packard Enterprise
The strongest all-round DR platform: continuous data protection with near-zero RPO across VMware, Hyper-V and public cloud, plus mature ransomware recovery.
Pricing: Per-VM subscription licensing (Enterprise and Advanced Resilience editions); quote-based via HPE and resellers. · self-hosted · cloud
Key features: Journal-based continuous data protection (CDP) with recovery points seconds apart, Real-time encryption/anomaly detection for early ransomware warning, Immutable journal copies and Cyber Resilience Vault for air-gapped recovery, Automated orchestration, non-disruptive testing and failback, Virtual Protection Groups for consistent multi-VM application recovery
Strengths
- Near-zero RPO (seconds) and minutes-level RTO via always-on replication, without snapshots
- Genuinely cross-platform across major hypervisors and public clouds - strong for hybrid estates
- Software-only, no dedicated appliance hardware, which limits lock-in
- Mature ransomware recovery with clean-point identification and immutable copies
Trade-offs
- No support for Proxmox or XCP-ng, which matters for teams migrating off VMware to those hypervisors
- Quote-based, per-VM licensing means no transparent public pricing to budget against
- Full value depends on correctly sizing journal and replication infrastructure
Zerto has long been a reference point for continuous data protection, and under HPE it remains a leading choice for organizations that want the tightest RPOs across heterogeneous environments. Its journal-based CDP captures every write, so recovery points sit seconds apart rather than hours, and its ransomware features - real-time encryption detection, immutable journal copies and clean-point recovery - are among the most mature in this list. The software-only architecture spans VMware, Hyper-V, Azure, AWS, Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud, and it is delivered both as self-managed software and as DRaaS through a large partner network.
The main caveats are practical rather than fundamental: there is no native support for Proxmox or XCP-ng, which is a real gap for teams leaving VMware for those platforms, and pricing is per-VM and quote-based, so budgeting requires a conversation with HPE or a reseller. For enterprises and MSPs that fit its platform coverage, though, it's the safest overall pick.
VMware Live Recovery · Broadcom (VMware)
The natural DR choice for VMware Cloud Foundation estates, combining cyber recovery and site recovery under one subscription - but VMware-centric by design.
Pricing: Subscription (protected-VM or per-core capacity); quote-based via Broadcom sales/partners, with 1- and 3-year prepaid options. · self-hosted · cloud
Key features: Combines VMware Live Cyber Recovery and VMware Live Site Recovery in one subscription, On-demand Isolated Recovery Environment (IRE) / clean room for ransomware validation, Embedded behavioral analysis and integration with Carbon Black, Customizable RPO as low as 1 minute with vSphere replication (15-minute high-frequency snapshots), Unified management across on-premises and public cloud DR
Strengths
- Tightest integration for VMware/VCF workloads, with a single subscription spanning DR and cyber recovery
- Strong purpose-built ransomware recovery via isolated clean rooms and guided workflows
- VMware Cloud on AWS as an on-demand recovery site avoids owning secondary hardware
- Some capabilities are included with VCF core entitlement
Trade-offs
- VMware-centric - not a fit for heterogeneous Hyper-V/physical/other-cloud estates
- Post-Broadcom licensing changes have made VMware pricing a common concern; quote-based only
- Cloud DR path is tied to VMware Cloud on AWS as the recovery target
VMware Live Recovery is the consolidation of what were VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery / Ransomware Recovery (now VMware Live Cyber Recovery) and Site Recovery Manager (now VMware Live Site Recovery) into a single subscription. For organizations standardized on VMware Cloud Foundation, it's the most natural fit: it protects vSphere workloads with customizable RPOs as low as one minute, provides an on-demand isolated recovery environment for validating and cleansing ransomware-affected VMs, and unifies on-premises and cloud DR in one console.
The trade-off is scope. This is a VMware-native solution - its strength inside VCF is also its limitation outside it, and it isn't the tool for heterogeneous estates. Licensing is quote-based, and post-acquisition pricing shifts have made cost a frequent discussion point for VMware customers. If you're a VMware shop, it belongs on your shortlist; if you're not, look elsewhere.
Veeam · Veeam Software
The most flexible route to DRaaS for many teams: replicate to a service provider of your choice via Cloud Connect, and orchestrate recovery with Veeam Recovery Orchestrator.
Pricing: Veeam licensing plus resources purchased from a Veeam Cloud & Service Provider (VCSP); Cloud Connect Replication itself carries no extra Veeam licence. · self-hosted · cloud
Key features: Image-based VM replication via Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Cloud Connect Replication to a DRaaS provider of your choice, Veeam Recovery Orchestrator for runbooks, non-disruptive testing and compliance reporting, Continuous data protection (CDP) for VMware vSphere, YARA-based threat scanning and clean-restore-point selection
Strengths
- Huge partner ecosystem - choose from many VCSP providers rather than one vendor cloud
- Leverages existing Veeam investment; Cloud Connect Replication needs no additional Veeam licence
- Strong orchestration, automated testing and audit-ready reporting via Recovery Orchestrator
- CDP option for vSphere brings RPOs down toward seconds for critical workloads
Trade-offs
- DR quality and pricing depend heavily on the chosen service provider, not just Veeam
- Full orchestration/CDP capabilities sit in higher, premium editions
- Assembling backup, Cloud Connect and Orchestrator is more moving parts than a single turnkey service
Veeam's approach to DRaaS is less a single product than a flexible model: replicate workloads with Veeam Backup & Replication, ship them off-site through Veeam Cloud Connect Replication to a Veeam Cloud & Service Provider of your choice, and drive tested, orchestrated recovery with Veeam Recovery Orchestrator. That flexibility is the point - you aren't tied to one vendor's cloud, and MSPs can build white-labelled DR services on top. Cloud Connect Replication requires no extra Veeam licence, so much of the cost is the provider's infrastructure.
The flip side is that outcomes depend on the provider you pick, and the most valuable orchestration and CDP capabilities live in premium editions. It's also more of an assembly than a turnkey box. But for the very large base of existing Veeam customers, and for MSPs, it's often the most pragmatic and least lock-in-prone way to deliver DR.
Azure Site Recovery · Microsoft
The obvious DR service for Microsoft-first organizations, with transparent per-instance pricing and native replication of VMs and physical servers to Azure.
Pricing: Published per-protected-instance licence plus Azure storage, transactions, egress and failover compute. · cloud
Key features: Continuous async replication of VMs and physical servers to Azure, Recovery plans with sequencing and Azure Automation runbooks, Non-disruptive test failover (DR drills), Transparent per-instance pricing with a 31-day free period per instance, Integration with Azure Backup and SQL Server Always On
Strengths
- Transparent, published per-instance pricing - rare in this market
- Native, first-party path into Azure with deep Microsoft ecosystem integration
- First 31 days free per protected instance eases testing and short migrations
- Broad source coverage: Azure, VMware, Hyper-V and physical servers
Trade-offs
- Azure is the recovery target - less suited to non-Azure DR strategies
- Headline per-instance fee excludes storage, transactions, egress and failover compute, so real cost is higher
- Self-managed: you own the recovery-plan design, testing and operations
Azure Site Recovery (ASR) is the default DR service for organizations already living in the Microsoft ecosystem. It replicates Azure VMs, VMware and Hyper-V VMs, and physical servers to Azure, supports recovery plans with sequencing and Azure Automation, and lets you run non-disruptive test failovers. Crucially - and unusually for this market - its pricing is public: roughly US$16 per protected instance per month to a customer-owned site and US$25 to Azure, with the first 31 days free per instance. That transparency makes budgeting and comparison far easier.
The caveats are the usual cloud-service ones. The per-instance fee is only part of the bill; you also pay for replica storage, transactions, egress and the compute consumed during a failover or drill. And because Azure is the recovery target, ASR is most compelling when Azure is already your strategic cloud. For Microsoft shops, it's a strong, well-priced, well-integrated choice; for others, its gravitational pull toward Azure is a consideration.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery · Amazon Web Services
The best-value cloud-native DR option: continuous block-level replication with simple per-server-hour pricing and no idle recovery site until you need it.
Pricing: Published flat per-source-server hourly fee, plus the EBS/EC2 resources consumed during replication and recovery. · cloud
Key features: Continuous, agent-based block-level replication to a low-cost AWS staging area, RPO of seconds and RTO of minutes (pilot-light model), Point-in-time recovery for ransomware protection, Non-disruptive drills and unified test/recover/fail-back workflow, Pay only for actively replicating servers; full DR site spun up only when needed
Strengths
- Simple, transparent, predictable per-server-hour pricing (US$0.028/server/hour)
- No idle secondary site - you pay for replication, and for compute only during drills/recovery
- Continuous replication delivers seconds-level RPO and minutes-level RTO
- Broad source support: physical, VMware, Hyper-V and other clouds
Trade-offs
- AWS is the recovery target - not a general multi-cloud DR tool
- Beyond the per-server fee, you pay for EBS staging storage, snapshots and EC2 during drills/recovery
- Self-managed and AWS-skewed; you design the recovery and networking
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (AWS DRS) is the value pick of this list. It continuously replicates source servers - physical, VMware, Hyper-V or other-cloud - at the block level into a cheap AWS staging area, and spins up full recovery instances only when you run a drill or an actual failover. That pilot-light model, combined with a flat and refreshingly transparent US$0.028 per source server per hour, keeps steady-state cost low while still delivering seconds-level RPO and minutes-level RTO, plus point-in-time recovery for ransomware scenarios.
As with ASR, the headline fee isn't the whole bill: you also pay for EBS staging volumes, snapshots and the EC2 compute used during drills and recovery. And it's AWS-centric by design, so it fits best when AWS is already in your strategy. For teams that value predictable, usage-based pricing and don't want to pay for an idle DR site, it's hard to beat.
Commvault Cloud · Commvault
The pick for heterogeneous enterprises that want DR and cyber recovery inside a broad data-protection platform, with continuous replication and clean-room recovery.
Pricing: Packaged tiers (Operational Recovery, Autonomous Recovery) plus Cleanroom add-on; quote-based. · self-hosted · cloud
Key features: Continuous and periodic replication with sub-minute RPO options, Hot-site (near-zero RTO) and cost-optimized warm-site recovery, Automated failover with recovery orchestration and validation, Cleanroom on-demand isolated recovery for testing and ransomware validation, Threat scanning and clean-recovery validation across broad workloads
Strengths
- Very broad workload coverage - DR sits inside a full backup and cyber-resilience platform
- Continuous replication for sub-minute RPO plus flexible hot/warm site cost controls
- Strong cyber-recovery story with Cleanroom and threat scanning
- Single console for backup, DR and security posture reduces tool sprawl
Trade-offs
- Packaged/tiered licensing plus Cleanroom add-on is quote-based and can get complex
- Breadth means more to learn than a focused, single-purpose DR tool
- Some user feedback cites support quality as inconsistent
Commvault Cloud (with its Auto Recovery capabilities, powered by Metallic AI) approaches DR as one facet of a broad cyber-resilience platform. It offers both continuous and periodic replication - targeting sub-minute RPO - with a choice of hot-site recovery for near-zero RTO or cost-optimized warm-site recovery, plus automated failover and orchestration. Its Cleanroom add-on provides an on-demand isolated environment to validate and recover cleanly after ransomware, and threat scanning runs across a wide range of workloads.
That breadth is the appeal and the catch. For enterprises that want backup, DR and security posture unified under one console across hypervisors, physical servers, cloud, databases and SaaS, Commvault is compelling. But the tiered packaging plus Cleanroom add-on is quote-based and can be intricate, there's more to learn than with a focused tool, and some users flag variable support. It's an enterprise-grade choice rather than an SMB one.
Datto SIRIS · Datto (Kaseya)
The go-to all-in-one BCDR for SMBs delivered through MSPs: hardware, software and cloud in one flat-fee package with instant virtualization and cloud failover.
Pricing: Flat-fee, all-inclusive (hardware, software, Datto Cloud); sold through MSP partners, quote-based. · cloud
Key features: Unified hardware, software and purpose-built Datto Cloud, Image-based backups with Inverse Chain Technology (every snapshot is bootable), Instant local or cloud virtualization for fast recovery, ZFS-snapshot immutability and ML-based ransomware detection, Automated (AI-assisted) screenshot verification of backup recoverability
Strengths
- Turnkey, all-in-one BCDR designed for MSPs and SMBs - minimal assembly
- Predictable flat-fee model with no charge for DR testing, compute or egress
- Strong recovery UX: instant virtualization locally or in the Datto Cloud
- Immutable Datto Cloud with Cloud Deletion Defense and ransomware detection
Trade-offs
- Image-snapshot based rather than true continuous CDP, so RPO is coarser than journal-based tools
- Sold through the MSP channel and quote-based - no self-serve public pricing
- Some users describe the interface as dated and certain workflows as complex
Datto SIRIS, now part of Kaseya, is purpose-built for MSPs delivering BCDR to SMB clients. It unifies a hardened local appliance (or software-only deployment), backup software, and the Datto Cloud into one flat-fee package, and its recovery experience is a strength: Inverse Chain Technology makes every incremental snapshot a bootable recovery point, and MSPs can virtualize a failed system instantly on the appliance or fail over into the Datto Cloud. Immutability comes from ZFS snapshots and Cloud Deletion Defense, with machine-learning ransomware detection layered on top, and the flat-fee model notably includes DR testing, compute and egress at no extra charge.
Where it trades off is precision and openness. It's image-snapshot based rather than journal-based CDP, so RPOs are coarser than Zerto or AWS DRS. It's sold through the MSP channel with quote-based pricing rather than self-serve, and some reviewers find the interface dated. For SMBs and the MSPs that serve them, though, it's one of the most complete turnkey continuity options available.
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud · Acronis
The easiest integrated cyber-protection-plus-DR option for SMBs via service providers: backup, security and cloud failover from one console with sub-15-minute RPO/RTO.
Pricing: Advanced Disaster Recovery add-on to Cyber Protect Cloud; per-workload plus pay-as-you-go DR storage/compute, via service providers. · cloud
Key features: Automated failover to Acronis Cloud with RunVM engine (RPO/RTO under 15 minutes), Drag-and-drop runbook orchestration and non-disruptive test failover, Integrated backup, anti-malware and DR from a single console, Malware-free failover point when paired with Advanced Security, Public API for integration with MSP RMM/PSA tools
Strengths
- Backup, security and DR unified - no separate platform to learn or manage
- IT-generalist-friendly setup with drag-and-drop runbooks and few-click configuration
- Documented RPO/RTO under 15 minutes with the RunVM engine
- Flexible connectivity (site-to-site, point-to-site, VPN-less) and cloud-only onboarding
Trade-offs
- DR is an add-on to Cyber Protect Cloud, not a standalone product
- Sub-15-minute RPO is solid but not seconds-level journal CDP
- Delivered via service providers with per-workload plus pay-as-you-go pricing - no simple public rate
Acronis takes the same "one platform" philosophy as its broader Cyber Protect Cloud and applies it to DR: its Advanced Disaster Recovery add-on layers cloud failover, orchestration and testing onto integrated backup and anti-malware, all from a single console. The RunVM engine targets RPO and RTO under 15 minutes, drag-and-drop runbooks make orchestration approachable for IT generalists, and connectivity is flexible - site-to-site VPN, point-to-site, or a VPN-less trial, with a cloud-only deployment option to simplify onboarding. Pairing DR with Advanced Security enables failover to a malware-free recovery point.
The trade-offs are that DR is an add-on rather than a standalone product, its sub-15-minute RPO is good but not journal-CDP territory, and it's delivered through service providers with per-workload plus pay-as-you-go pricing that requires a partner quote. For SMBs and the MSPs serving them who value having backup, security and DR in one easy-to-run place, it's a very practical choice.
Comparison matrix
| Feature | Zerto (HPE) | VMware Live Recovery | Veeam | Azure Site Recovery | AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | Commvault Cloud | Datto SIRIS | Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous data protection (near-zero / seconds RPO) | Journal CDP, seconds | RPO from 1 min | CDP for vSphere | Async replication | Continuous block-level | Continuous replication | Image snapshots | RPO < 15 min |
| Cyber / ransomware recovery (immutable + clean room) | Immutable + vault | Isolated recovery env | Clean room + YARA | Via Azure Backup | Point-in-time recovery | Cleanroom + Threat Scan | Immutable cloud + ML detect | Malware-free failover |
| Heterogeneous platform coverage (beyond VMware) | VMware, Hyper-V, clouds | VMware/VCF only | Broad | VMware/Hyper-V/physical to Azure | Physical/VMware/Hyper-V/cloud | Broad | Windows/Linux servers & VMs | Physical, VMs, hypervisors |
| Public cloud as native recovery target | Azure, AWS, more | VMware Cloud on AWS | Via VCSP / hyperscaler | Azure | AWS | Cloud & secondary site | Datto Cloud | Acronis Cloud |
| Delivered as fully managed / provider service | Software + 350+ MSPs | Cloud-managed, self-driven | DRaaS via VCSP | Self-managed | Self-managed | SaaS + partners | MSP-delivered BCDR | Provider-delivered DRaaS |
| Transparent / published pricing | Quote only | Quote only | Licensing published; DR via partner | Published per instance | Published per server-hour | Quote only | Quote only (flat fee) | Per-workload + PAYG via partner |
Yes Partial No— Unknown
Pricing overview
Pricing in the DRaaS market is mostly opaque: six of the eight solutions here are quote-based through the vendor or a partner. Only Azure Site Recovery (about US$16 per protected instance/month to a customer-owned site, or US$25 to Azure, first 31 days free) and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (a flat US$0.028 per source server per hour) publish transparent per-unit pricing - and even those exclude the storage, egress and failover compute that make up much of a real bill. Expect DRaaS cost to depend heavily on data volume, change rate, how many workloads you protect, RPO/RTO targets, and how often you run drills.
Watch out for
- Only Azure Site Recovery and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery publish per-unit prices; all others require a vendor or partner quote.
- Published per-instance/per-server fees exclude replica storage, snapshots, egress and failover compute, so actual cost is higher.
- Cloud DR cost scales with data change rate, workload count, drill frequency and RPO/RTO - model it against your own environment.
- Prices change; verify current rates on the official pricing pages before budgeting.
Pricing last checked July 5, 2026.
Best for each use case
| Use case | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-platform enterprise DR with seconds-level RPO · Enterprises and MSPs with hybrid estates | Zerto (HPE) (alt: Commvault Cloud) | Journal-based CDP delivers near-zero RPO across VMware, Hyper-V and multiple clouds in one platform. No native Proxmox/XCP-ng support; pricing is quote-based. |
| DR for a VMware Cloud Foundation estate · VMware/VCF-standardized organizations | VMware Live Recovery (alt: Zerto (HPE)) | Tightest VMware integration, combining site recovery and ransomware recovery under one subscription. VMware-centric; confirm current Broadcom licensing costs. |
| Microsoft/Azure-first DR with predictable pricing · Azure-invested IT teams | Azure Site Recovery (alt: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery) | Native replication to Azure with published per-instance pricing and deep Microsoft integration. Recovery target is Azure; budget for storage and failover compute beyond the per-instance fee. |
| Lowest-cost cloud-native DR with pay-per-use · Cost-sensitive, AWS-centric organizations | AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (alt: Azure Site Recovery) | Flat per-server-hour pricing, no idle DR site, and seconds-level RPO for AWS-friendly teams. AWS is the recovery target; EBS/EC2 costs apply during drills and recovery. |
| MSP delivering DRaaS without DR-site lock-in · MSPs and existing Veeam customers | Veeam (alt: Datto SIRIS) | Cloud Connect Replication plus Recovery Orchestrator let providers deliver tested DR on their choice of cloud. Outcomes and pricing depend on the chosen service provider. |
| Turnkey backup + DR for an SMB via an MSP · SMBs served by MSPs | Datto SIRIS (alt: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud) | All-in-one hardware, software and cloud with instant virtualization and flat, testing-inclusive pricing. Image-snapshot based (coarser RPO) and sold through the MSP channel. |
| Unified cyber protection and DR for a small IT team · SMBs and MSPs wanting an integrated suite | Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud (alt: Datto SIRIS) | Backup, anti-malware and DR in one console with sub-15-minute RPO/RTO and generalist-friendly runbooks. DR is an add-on; pricing is per-workload plus pay-as-you-go via a provider. |
Category winners
Zerto (HPE)
Seconds-level RPO across VMware, Hyper-V and multiple clouds, with mature ransomware recovery.
Runner-up: Commvault Cloud
VMware Live Recovery
Deepest VMware/VCF integration with combined site and ransomware recovery.
Runner-up: Zerto (HPE)
Azure Site Recovery
Native Azure replication with rare, transparent per-instance pricing.
Runner-up: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Flat per-server-hour pricing and no idle DR site, with seconds-level RPO.
Runner-up: Azure Site Recovery
Veeam
Provider-agnostic DRaaS via Cloud Connect plus strong orchestration.
Runner-up: Datto SIRIS
Datto SIRIS
Turnkey hardware, software and cloud with instant recovery and flat pricing.
Runner-up: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Buying guide
First decide who operates your DR: run it yourself (Zerto, ASR, AWS DRS, VMware Live Recovery), consume it through a provider (Veeam VCSP, Datto, Acronis), or a mix. Then match to your platform and RPO needs. Enterprises with tight RPOs and mixed stacks lean Zerto or Commvault; VMware shops lean VMware Live Recovery; hyperscaler-committed teams lean ASR or AWS DRS; SMBs are usually best served by MSP-delivered Datto or Acronis.
Avoid if
Honorable mentions
11:11 Systems · 11:11 Systems
A well-known fully managed DRaaS provider (incorporating the former iland and Sungard AS assets) for organizations that want DR run entirely for them.
Why not ranked: It's a managed service provider rather than a product-comparable platform, so it sits outside this like-for-like roundup.
VisitDruva · Druva
A SaaS-first data resilience platform with backup and DR delivered as a fully managed cloud service.
Why not ranked: Its SaaS-only model and data-protection breadth make it a different shape from the DR-focused platforms ranked here; verify DR specifics for your workloads.
VisitAxcient x360Recover · Axcient
A popular MSP-focused BCDR platform with chain-free backup and cloud failover, competing directly with Datto in the SMB/MSP space.
Why not ranked: Kept as an alternative to Datto and Acronis to avoid over-weighting the SMB/MSP segment; worth evaluating alongside them.
VisitRecovery Point · Recovery Point Systems
A managed resiliency provider noted by Gartner for legacy-platform support (IBM mainframe, Power Systems) and multiplatform orchestration.
Why not ranked: It's a specialist managed service for legacy and heterogeneous environments rather than a self-service product.
VisitFrequently asked questions
What is DRaaS (Disaster Recovery as a Service)?
DRaaS is a service that replicates your production workloads off-site - usually to a cloud - and lets you fail them over and run them there within minutes of an outage, ransomware attack or hardware failure, then fail back once the primary site is restored. It replaces the capital cost of an idle secondary data center with on-demand, subscription-based recovery.
What's the difference between backup and DRaaS?
Backup makes recoverable copies of data to restore after loss or corruption; it can take hours to rebuild systems. DRaaS adds continuous or frequent replication plus orchestrated failover, so entire systems can be brought online quickly at a recovery site. Backup answers "can I get my data back?"; DRaaS answers "can the business keep running?"
Which DRaaS solution is best overall?
For most organizations needing tight RPOs across mixed platforms, Zerto (HPE) is the strongest all-rounder thanks to journal-based continuous data protection and mature ransomware recovery. But the best choice depends on your platform: VMware shops may prefer VMware Live Recovery, Microsoft shops Azure Site Recovery, and SMBs an MSP-delivered service like Datto or Acronis.
Which DRaaS options have transparent pricing?
Only Azure Site Recovery (about US$16-25 per protected instance per month, first 31 days free) and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (a flat US$0.028 per source server per hour) publish per-unit pricing. Both figures exclude storage, egress and failover compute. Zerto, VMware, Veeam, Commvault, Datto and Acronis are quote-based through the vendor or a partner.
What RPO and RTO can DRaaS achieve?
It varies by solution and configuration. Journal or block-level continuous data protection (Zerto, AWS DRS, Commvault) can achieve RPOs measured in seconds and RTOs in minutes. Snapshot-based tools (Datto) and add-on DR (Acronis, targeting under 15 minutes) offer coarser but still strong recovery objectives. Always confirm achievable numbers for your specific workloads.
Is DRaaS good for small businesses?
Yes - DRaaS is arguably most transformative for SMBs, because it delivers enterprise-grade recovery without a secondary data center. Small businesses are usually best served through an MSP using an all-in-one platform such as Datto SIRIS or a Veeam-/Acronis-powered service, which bundles the technology, cloud and management.
Do these DRaaS tools protect against ransomware?
Most now include cyber-recovery features such as immutable copies, isolated clean-room recovery and the ability to fail over to a known-clean point. Zerto, VMware Live Recovery, Veeam, Commvault, Datto and Acronis all document such capabilities; the hyperscaler services lean on point-in-time recovery and adjacent services. Implementations differ, so confirm the clean-recovery workflow.
Do any of these support Proxmox or XCP-ng?
Not natively, based on current vendor documentation. If you run Proxmox or XCP-ng, you'll need to evaluate other approaches or platform-specific tools, and should confirm hypervisor support directly with any vendor before committing.
Final recommendation
DRaaS spans self-managed platforms, hyperscaler services and fully managed offerings, so there's no single winner - only the best fit for your platform, RPO needs and operating model. Zerto (HPE) leads for cross-platform, seconds-level DR; VMware Live Recovery for VMware estates; Azure Site Recovery and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for Microsoft- and AWS-first teams with transparent pricing; Commvault Cloud for heterogeneous enterprises; and Veeam, Datto and Acronis for provider- or MSP-delivered recovery aimed largely at SMBs.
Choose DRaaS by fit, not by ranking: the strongest solution is the one that natively supports your workloads, hits your recovery targets, and suits whether you'll operate DR in-house or through a partner.
Best overall
Zerto (HPE)
Best value
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Best enterprise
Zerto (HPE)
Limitations






