Security Onion
Security Onion Solutions
Wazuh
Wazuh Inc.
Security Onion and Wazuh are both free, open-source, self-hosted security platforms with passionate communities - which makes them easy to confuse. But they answer different questions. Security Onion is a network-security-monitoring distribution: you deploy sensors that watch traffic with Suricata and Zeek, capture full packets, and pipe everything into the Elastic Stack for threat hunting and DFIR. Wazuh is a host-centric XDR/SIEM: you deploy lightweight agents on endpoints for log analysis, file integrity monitoring, vulnerability detection, configuration assessment, and compliance reporting. They overlap on log management and threat detection, but their centers of gravity are different - and many mature SOCs run both. The right choice depends on whether your biggest gap is network visibility or host, compliance, and vulnerability coverage.
Key takeaways
- Security Onion is network-centric (NSM, IDS, full packet capture); Wazuh is host-centric (agent-based XDR/SIEM).
- Both are free and open source; costs are operational (and optional commercial support/appliances/cloud).
- Wazuh ships out-of-the-box compliance (PCI, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST) and vulnerability detection; Security Onion excels at packet capture and DFIR.
- Security Onion 2.4+ uses Elastic Agent for host data - it no longer bundles Wazuh as its HIDS.
- There's no universal winner - they solve different problems and are frequently deployed together.
Quick verdict · Depends on network vs host priority (and they combine well)
Winner: Depends
There's no single winner because they specialize differently. Security Onion is the better choice when your priority is network security monitoring - signature-based IDS, rich network metadata, full packet capture, and DFIR from network sensors. Wazuh is the better choice for host and endpoint coverage: agent-based log analysis, file integrity monitoring, vulnerability detection, configuration assessment, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and out-of-the-box compliance. Both are free, open source, and self-hosted, and many teams run them together - Wazuh for hosts, Security Onion for the network.
Choose Security Onion if
Choose Wazuh if
Rule of thumb
Scorecard
Security Onion leads network monitoring, packet capture, and DFIR; Wazuh leads endpoint coverage, compliance, and vulnerability management; both are strong on openness, cost, and scalability.
| Criterion | Security Onion | Wazuh | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network security monitoring | 9/10 | 4/10 | Security Onion |
| Endpoint / host coverage | 6/10 | 9/10 | Wazuh |
| Compliance & vulnerability management | 5/10 | 9/10 | Wazuh |
| Log management & SIEM | 8/10 | 8/10 | Tie |
| Threat hunting & DFIR | 9/10 | 7/10 | Security Onion |
| Openness & cost | 8/10 | 9/10 | Wazuh |
| Ease of deployment | 6/10 | 8/10 | Wazuh |
Head-to-head
Primary purpose and architecture
DependsWhat each platform is built to do and how it's structured.
Security Onion
Security Onion is a network-security-monitoring distribution - a full platform you deploy as a grid of manager, sensor, and search nodes. Sensors watch traffic and generate logs; everything flows into the Elastic Stack, surfaced through the Security Onion Console (SOC) for alerts, dashboards, hunting, cases, and grid management. It scales from a single appliance to a thousand-node grid and has been downloaded over 2 million times.
Wazuh
Wazuh is a host-centric unified XDR + SIEM. A lightweight agent on each endpoint sends telemetry to the Wazuh server (decoders, rules, correlation), which forwards analyzed data to the Wazuh indexer (an OpenSearch fork) and dashboard. A fork of OSSEC (2015), it deploys single-node or clustered and scales to tens of thousands of agents.
Verdict
Network visibility (IDS, metadata, packet capture)
Security OnionAbility to detect and investigate threats on the wire.
Security Onion
This is Security Onion's core strength: signature-based NIDS via Suricata, rich protocol metadata via Zeek (or Suricata), full packet capture (Stenographer or Suricata PCAP), file analysis via Strelka, and OpenCanary intrusion-detection honeypots. Few open-source stacks match this network depth in one installer.
Wazuh
Wazuh is not a network monitoring tool: it has no built-in NIDS or full packet capture. It can ingest network-device logs agentlessly via syslog/SSH/APIs, but it doesn't inspect traffic or store packets, so network-level detection is a gap you'd fill with another tool.
Verdict
Endpoint and host coverage
WazuhDepth of monitoring on servers and workstations.
Security Onion
Security Onion's host layer is the Elastic Agent (data collection, live queries via osquery, centralized management via Elastic Fleet). Notably, in Security Onion 2.4+ Elastic Agent replaced the earlier osquery, Beats, and Wazuh components - so Security Onion no longer bundles Wazuh as its HIDS. Host coverage is capable but secondary to its network focus.
Wazuh
Endpoints are Wazuh's home turf. Agents run on Linux, Windows, macOS, Solaris, AIX, and HP-UX, delivering file integrity monitoring, host intrusion/rootkit detection, security configuration assessment, software inventory, and active response, with deep Windows coverage (event logs, registry, VirusTotal, YARA).
Verdict
Compliance and vulnerability management
WazuhOut-of-the-box regulatory and CVE coverage.
Security Onion
Security Onion focuses on detection, hunting, and forensics rather than compliance dashboards; you can build compliance views from its data, but it doesn't ship prebuilt regulatory modules or CVE-based vulnerability scanning as a headline feature.
Wazuh
Wazuh has built-in compliance dashboards for PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and NIST 800-53, plus automated vulnerability detection (correlating agent software inventory against CVE feeds) and CIS-benchmark security configuration assessment - often the deciding factor for regulated organizations and MSPs.
Verdict
Log management and SIEM
TieCentralized collection, indexing, correlation, and search.
Security Onion
Security Onion centralizes logs into the Elastic Stack (Elasticsearch/Logstash/Kibana) and can act as a syslog destination for other sources, with its own SOC interfaces for alerting, dashboards, and hunting. It's a capable SIEM, strongest when network data is part of the picture.
Wazuh
Wazuh provides SIEM-style log collection, decoding, correlation, and retention in its OpenSearch-based indexer, with 5000+ built-in rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and extensive decoders for common software and cloud services (AWS, Azure, GCP, M365, GitHub).
Verdict
Threat hunting and DFIR
Security OnionInvestigation, forensics, and incident response.
Security Onion
Security Onion shines here: full packet capture lets analysts reconstruct sessions, Strelka analyzes extracted files, and bundled analyst tools (Wireshark, NetworkMiner via the Desktop option) plus SOC case management support deep DFIR - the reason it's a staple in SANS courses and threat-hunting exercises.
Wazuh
Wazuh supports hunting through rules, decoders, log archives, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and active response for containment, but without packet capture its forensic depth on the network is limited to logged telemetry.
Verdict
Openness, licensing, and cost
WazuhLicense model and total cost of ownership.
Security Onion
Security Onion is a free and open platform, though it combines components under mixed licenses (BSD, GPL, Apache, and the Elastic License 2.0) - the latter being source-available rather than OSI open source. Commercial options (appliances, Pro license, training, support) fund the project.
Wazuh
Wazuh's core engine is GPLv2 with the indexer/dashboard on Apache-2.0 OpenSearch, and there's no paid tier gating features - every capability is free to self-host. Wazuh Inc. monetizes via optional Wazuh Cloud and professional support. This 'no feature gating' purity appeals to teams that weigh open-source licensing carefully.
Verdict
Deployment and operational model
WazuhWhat it takes to stand up and run each.
Security Onion
Security Onion is a full distribution (Oracle Linux 9 base) deployed as Import/Evaluation/Standalone/Distributed grids. Production needs dedicated network sensor hardware (SPAN/TAP, CPU-heavy Suricata/Zeek), so it's more infrastructure to plan; Security Onion Solutions sells matched appliances.
Wazuh
Wazuh installs the manager, indexer, and dashboard from a single all-in-one installer in roughly 10 - 15 minutes on a correctly sized host, then you enroll agents. It scales horizontally later. Both, however, demand real tuning - out-of-the-box rules are noisy until adapted.
Verdict
Feature matrix
| Feature | Security Onion | Wazuh | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free and open source · Licensing | Free/open; mixed licenses incl. Elastic License | GPLv2 core + Apache-2.0 OpenSearch | Wazuh |
| Network IDS (Suricata/Zeek) · Network | Suricata + Zeek | No built-in NIDS | Security Onion |
| Full packet capture · Network | Stenographer / Suricata PCAP | Not supported | Security Onion |
| Agent-based endpoint monitoring · Host | Elastic Agent / osquery | Multi-OS Wazuh agent | Wazuh |
| File integrity monitoring (FIM) · Host | Via Elastic Agent config | Core Wazuh capability | Wazuh |
| Vulnerability detection (CVE) · Host | Not a headline feature | CVE correlation module | Wazuh |
| Out-of-the-box compliance dashboards · Compliance | Build your own | PCI/GDPR/HIPAA/NIST | Wazuh |
| MITRE ATT&CK mapping · Detection | Via detections/rules | Rules tagged to ATT&CK | Tie |
| Log management / SIEM search · SIEM | Elastic Stack | OpenSearch indexer | Tie |
| Active response / containment · Response | Via integrations | Built-in active response | Wazuh |
| Cloud & container security integrations · Cloud | Ingest cloud logs | AWS/Azure/GCP/M365, Docker/K8s | Wazuh |
| Vendor appliances / managed cloud · Commercial | Appliances, Pro, training | Wazuh Cloud, support | Tie |
Pricing
Both platforms are free and open source to self-host - there are no license fees for the software itself. Real cost is operational (infrastructure, tuning, staff), plus optional commercial add-ons: Security Onion Solutions sells appliances, a Pro license, training, and support; Wazuh Inc. offers Wazuh Cloud (managed SaaS) and professional support. Commercial pricing is quote/product-based.
| Security Onion | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Free, self-hosted platform (mixed open/source-available licenses). Optional commercial: Security Onion Pro license, matched hardware appliances, official training, and professional support (quote/product-based). | Free, self-hosted (GPLv2 core + Apache-2.0 OpenSearch) with no feature gating and no per-agent/per-GB fees. Optional commercial: Wazuh Cloud managed service and professional support (quote-based). |
| Starting price | Free (open source, self-hosted); commercial appliances/Pro/support by quote | Free (open source, self-hosted); Wazuh Cloud/support by quote |
Pricing is mixed (checked July 5, 2026).
The software is genuinely free for both; budget for infrastructure and operations. Commercial appliances, Pro/Cloud tiers, and support are quote-based - request quotes for your scale. Don't treat 'free' as 'no cost': tuning and running either platform requires real staff time.
Best for each use case
| Use case | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Network security monitoring & IDS · SOCs, network defenders | Security Onion | Suricata/Zeek IDS, network metadata, and full packet capture are Security Onion's core.Requires dedicated sensor hardware and SPAN/TAP access. |
| Endpoint monitoring, FIM & vulnerability management · Endpoint/security teams | Wazuh | Wazuh agents deliver FIM, CVE-based vulnerability detection, and SCA across many OSes.No network-layer detection on its own. |
| Compliance-driven monitoring (PCI/GDPR/HIPAA/NIST) · Regulated organizations | Wazuh | Out-of-the-box compliance dashboards and mappings speed audits.Compliance still depends on correct scoping and tuning. |
| DFIR and deep threat hunting · IR/hunt teams | Security Onion | Full packet capture and file analysis enable session reconstruction and forensics.Storage-heavy; plan packet-capture retention. |
| MSP-managed SOC on a budget · MSPs | Depends | Wazuh's GPLv2 model and single-host quickstart suit managed endpoint/compliance SOC; Security Onion suits on-site network monitoring; many MSPs offer both.Both require tuning and operational maturity to deliver value. |
| Full-spectrum visibility (network + host) · Mature SOCs | Tie | Running both - Wazuh on hosts, Security Onion on the network - closes each other's gaps.Two platforms mean more operational overhead and integration work. |
Pros & cons
Security Onion
- Strengths
- Best-in-class open-source network security monitoring (Suricata/Zeek + full packet capture)
- Strong DFIR and threat hunting with file analysis and analyst tooling
- Turnkey distribution with its own SOC console and distributed grid scaling
- Commercial appliances, Pro features, and training available
- Trade-offs
- Needs dedicated sensor hardware and SPAN/TAP for production
- Weaker out-of-the-box endpoint, compliance, and vulnerability features
- Mixed licensing includes the source-available Elastic License
- More infrastructure to plan than a single-host install
Security Onion is the network-visibility and DFIR leader, at the cost of more infrastructure and thinner host/compliance coverage.
Wazuh
- Strengths
- Deep multi-OS endpoint coverage (FIM, host IDS, SCA, inventory)
- Out-of-the-box compliance (PCI/GDPR/HIPAA/NIST) and CVE vulnerability detection
- Fully GPLv2/Apache with no feature gating; fast single-host install
- Large community, 5000+ rules, cloud/container integrations, active response
- Trade-offs
- No built-in network IDS or full packet capture
- Not a full EDR (limited kernel-level telemetry vs commercial EDR)
- Noisy defaults require significant tuning
- Network-layer detection needs a separate tool
Wazuh is the host, compliance, and vulnerability leader with a purer open-source model, but lacks network monitoring and deep EDR telemetry.
Decision guide
Choose Security Onion when
- Network visibility, IDS, and packet capture are your priority
- You do deep DFIR / threat hunting and need session reconstruction
- You have (or will deploy) dedicated network sensors
Choose Wazuh when
- Endpoint, FIM, and vulnerability coverage across many OSes matter most
- You need out-of-the-box compliance (PCI/GDPR/HIPAA/NIST)
- You want a fast single-host install and a strictly open (GPLv2) stack
Choose neither when
- You want a fully managed cloud SIEM with vendor-run operations - consider a commercial SIEM/MDR instead
Lead with your biggest gap: network visibility points to Security Onion; endpoint, compliance, and vulnerability coverage point to Wazuh. Because they cover different layers, running both is a legitimate and common answer.
Migration — Historical alerts and indices don't transfer between the two platforms; export/retain separately if continuity matters.
Security & compliance
Both are self-hosted, so you control the data and the security boundary. Wazuh encrypts agent-to-server traffic (AES-256) and dashboard/API traffic (TLS); Security Onion secures its grid and console. As self-managed platforms, their security posture depends heavily on how you deploy, patch, and tune them.
Wazuh ships prebuilt compliance mappings and dashboards (PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST 800-53) plus SCA/CIS checks, making it stronger for audit-driven use. Security Onion supports compliance indirectly through its data and DFIR capabilities but doesn't ship regulatory modules as a headline feature. Compliance outcomes depend on correct scoping in either case.
Performance & scalability
Both are resource-intensive at scale, but in different ways: Security Onion's Suricata/Zeek sensors are CPU-heavy (roughly a core per ~200Mbps per engine) and packet capture is storage-heavy; Wazuh's indexer is RAM/JVM-heavy. Neither is 'set and forget' - tuning drives both performance and signal quality.
Security Onion scales from a single appliance to thousand-node grids; Wazuh scales from a single host to clusters handling tens of thousands of agents (50,000+ in public cases).
Alternatives
Elastic Security · Elastic
SIEM/endpoint on the Elastic Stack with a free tier and paid features.
Why consider — Unified SIEM + endpoint on a familiar stack
Malcolm · CISA / Idaho National Laboratory
Open-source network traffic analysis suite (Zeek/Suricata/Arkime).
Why consider — Free, network-focused alternative to Security Onion
Graylog · Graylog
Open-core log management/SIEM with a strong free tier.
Why consider — Flexible log management with security features
Frequently asked questions
Are Security Onion and Wazuh competitors or complementary?
Both - they overlap on log management and detection but specialize differently: Security Onion in network monitoring and packet capture, Wazuh in endpoint, compliance, and vulnerability coverage. Many teams run them together, with Wazuh on hosts and Security Onion on the network.
Does Security Onion still include Wazuh?
No. Older versions used Wazuh/OSSEC for host-based detection, but Security Onion 2.4 and later replaced it with the Elastic Agent (with osquery) for host visibility. If you want Wazuh, you deploy it separately.
Which is better for compliance?
Wazuh. It ships out-of-the-box dashboards and mappings for PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and NIST 800-53, plus CIS-benchmark configuration assessment and CVE-based vulnerability detection - features Security Onion doesn't provide as prebuilt modules.
Which is better for network monitoring?
Security Onion. It bundles Suricata and Zeek for intrusion detection and network metadata plus full packet capture and file analysis. Wazuh has no built-in network IDS or packet capture and only ingests network-device logs agentlessly.
Are both really free?
Yes, the software is free to self-host. Wazuh's core is GPLv2 with no feature gating; Security Onion is free but mixes licenses including the source-available Elastic License. Budget for infrastructure, storage, and staff time, plus optional commercial support/appliances/cloud.
Is Wazuh a full EDR?
Not quite. Wazuh delivers strong host telemetry, FIM, and active response, but it doesn't match a dedicated EDR like CrowdStrike Falcon or SentinelOne in kernel-level telemetry and automated response depth. Some teams pair Wazuh with a commercial EDR.
Which is easier to deploy?
Wazuh's all-in-one installer brings up a working server in about 10 - 15 minutes on one host. Security Onion is a full distribution that needs dedicated network sensors and SPAN/TAP access for production, so it takes more planning. Both require ongoing tuning.
Which should an MSP choose?
It depends on the service. Wazuh's GPLv2 model and single-host quickstart suit managed endpoint/compliance monitoring; Security Onion suits on-site network monitoring and DFIR. Many MSPs offer both, matched to each client's needs.
Final verdict
Security Onion and Wazuh are both excellent free, open-source security platforms, but they own different layers. Security Onion is the network-security-monitoring and DFIR leader (Suricata/Zeek IDS, full packet capture, Elastic Stack). Wazuh is the host-centric XDR/SIEM leader (multi-OS agents, FIM, vulnerability detection, and out-of-the-box compliance) with a purer GPLv2 model. Both are self-hosted, community-strong, and scalable.
No universal winner - pick by whether your priority is network or host/compliance visibility, and consider running both.
Security Onion is best for
Wazuh is best for






